Posledn\u00edch n\u011bkolik m\u011bs\u00edc\u016f p\u0159ineslo spoustu kritiky sm\u011b\u0159uj\u00edc\u00ed od u\u010ditel\u016f k u\u010ditel\u016fm. Syndrom housete vysv\u011btlil, pro\u010d se n\u011bkte\u0159\u00ed necht\u011bj\u00ed vzd\u00e1t sv\u00fdch praktik. Souhlas\u00edm, nadm\u00edru souhlas\u00edm.\u00a0 Obzvl\u00e1\u0161\u0165 v oboru technologi\u00ed. Jen z toho st\u011b\u017eov\u00e1n\u00ed za\u010d\u00edn\u00e1m m\u00edt dojem, \u017ee jedni si st\u011b\u017euj\u00ed na pom\u011bry (nem\u016f\u017eu kop\u00edrovat, nemaj\u00ed slovn\u00ed z\u00e1sobu, nem\u00e1m pen\u00edze na knihy, nem\u00e1me tolik po\u010d\u00edta\u010d\u016f – tak co po mn\u011b chcete?) a ti druz\u00ed si tak\u00e9 st\u011b\u017euj\u00ed (co v\u0161echno ti prvn\u00ed ned\u011blaj\u00ed), a tak vlastn\u011b sv\u00fdm zp\u016fsobem stoj\u00edme na stejn\u00e9 stran\u011b v\u0161eobecn\u00e9ho na\u0159\u00edk\u00e1n\u00ed. Kdy\u017e chci, aby u\u010ditel\u00e9 diskutovali\u00a0 o n\u011b\u010dem konstruktivn\u00edm, kon\u010d\u00ed to obvykle zase jen st\u011b\u017eov\u00e1n\u00edm. Nicm\u00e9n\u011b st\u00e1le uva\u017euji o tom, jak\u00e9 konkr\u00e9tn\u00ed pochody na\u0161\u00ed mysli n\u00e1m zabra\u0148uj\u00ed vid\u011bt inovace t\u0159eba ve v\u00fduce literatury. Kdy\u017e opominu neochotu vzd\u011bl\u00e1vat se v oboru technologi\u00ed, mo\u017en\u00e1 by bylo pot\u0159eba analyzovat dal\u0161\u00ed obecn\u00e9 omyly u\u010ditelsk\u00e9ho my\u0161len\u00ed. A od toho se posunout d\u00e1l. Za\u010d\u00edt vysv\u011btlovat od toho, co zap\u0159\u00ed\u010di\u0148uje omyl.<\/p>\n
Abyste pochopili, co mysl\u00edm omyly v my\u0161len\u00ed, uk\u00e1\u017eu nejd\u0159\u00edve p\u0159\u00edklad z teorie komunikace z knihy Josepha A. DeVita. Nap\u0159. v\u011bta „On je ateista, co byste od n\u011bj \u010dekali.“ obsahuje odsuzov\u00e1n\u00ed bez d\u016fkaz\u016f, negativn\u00ed n\u00e1lepku. N\u00e1lepky pro \u017e\u00e1ky tak\u00e9 zn\u00e1me z knihy Respektovat a b\u00fdt respektov\u00e1n. (U\u017e jsi zase <\/em>n\u011bco provedl! Ve slov\u011b zase<\/em> se skr\u00fdv\u00e1 n\u00e1lepka, ani nemus\u00ed b\u00fdt explicitn\u00ed, vyj\u00e1d\u0159en\u00e1 slovem lajd\u00e1k.)<\/p>\n Odsuzov\u00e1n\u00ed bez d\u016fkaz\u016f se objevuje ve dvou druz\u00edch u\u010ditelsk\u00fdch n\u00e1lepek. 1. Tohle u\u017e d\u011bl\u00e1me. 2. Tohle jsou jen fr\u00e1ze.K prvn\u00edmu bodu: U\u010ditel\u00e9 nap\u0159. nut\u00ed \u017e\u00e1ky vracet se k p\u0159e\u010dten\u00e9mu textu, u\u010d\u00ed je nach\u00e1zet nejd\u016fle\u017eit\u011bj\u0161\u00ed informace, hledat, \u010demu nerozum\u00ed, u\u010d\u00ed je porozum\u011bt textu. Opravdu se tohle d\u011bje? Tak pro\u010d si vz\u00e1p\u011bt\u00ed st\u011b\u017eujeme na to, \u017ee \u017e\u00e1ci neum\u00ed pojmenovat hlavn\u00ed postavy? V \u010dem je probl\u00e9m? \u017de jsou l\u00edn\u00ed se vr\u00e1tit nebo si tuhle informaci prost\u011b nepamatuj\u00ed? Anebo m\u016fj n\u00e1vrh: Kdo jim na za\u010d\u00e1tku \u0159ekl, \u017ee maj\u00ed d\u00e1vat pozor na to, jak se postavy jmenuj\u00ed a pro\u010d je to d\u016fle\u017eit\u00e9?<\/p>\n Probl\u00e9m mo\u017en\u00e1 nen\u00ed v tom, \u017ee n\u011bkter\u00e9 v\u011bci ned\u011bl\u00e1me, sp\u00ed\u0161 je nedotahujeme do konce, v n\u011bm\u017e by byli samostatn\u011b schopn\u00ed splnit t\u011b\u017ek\u00e9 \u00fakoly (= my\u0161lenkov\u00e9 procesy) zku\u0161en\u00e9ho \u010dten\u00e1\u0159e i bez na\u0161ich ot\u00e1zek a instrukc\u00ed. V\u011bdomi toho, \u017ee jm\u00e9na hlavn\u00edch postav a jejich vlastnosti umo\u017en\u00ed l\u00e9pe zachytit vztahy mezi nimi a hledat p\u0159\u00ed\u010diny z\u00e1pletky, ale tak\u00e9 p\u0159edv\u00edd\u00e1n\u00ed dal\u0161\u00edho d\u011bje a t\u00edm p\u00e1dem i radost ze \u010dten\u00ed. Mo\u017en\u00e1 se pt\u00e1me po jm\u00e9nech postav a jejich vlastnotech jen proto, abychom jen kontrolovali jejich porozum\u011bn\u00ed. Mo\u017en\u00e1 jen brouzd\u00e1me po povrchu didaktiky i literatury, ani\u017e bychom nahl\u00e9dli jejich skute\u010dn\u00e9 principy. Naplno \u0159e\u010deno: my nerozum\u00edme. Ne na\u0161i \u017e\u00e1ci. (Te\u010f si tak\u00e9 st\u011b\u017euji.) Dalo by se s t\u00edmto n\u011bco ud\u011blat? V posledn\u00ed dob\u011b o tom hodn\u011b pochybuji. M\u00e1m dojem, \u017ee nab\u00edz\u00edme p\u0159\u00edli\u0161 odpov\u011bd\u00ed, ani\u017e bychom si kladli ot\u00e1zky, kter\u00e9 by posunovaly na\u0161e my\u0161len\u00ed za r\u00e1mec v\u0161ev\u011bdoucnosti. Jen\u017ee na za\u010d\u00e1tku je skute\u010dn\u011b moment, kdy n\u011b\u010demu nerozum\u00edme a pak n\u00e1sleduj\u00ed ot\u00e1zky, je\u017e dovoluj\u00ed odpov\u00eddat z r\u016fzn\u00fdch \u00fahl\u016f. (T\u00edmto se nebezpe\u010dn\u011b bl\u00ed\u017e\u00edm \u010dl\u00e1nku p. Broma a vysek\u00e1v\u00e1m mu poklonu.)<\/p>\n Ale vr\u00e1t\u00edm se sp\u00ed\u0161 k n\u011bkolika dal\u0161\u00edm p\u0159\u00edklad\u016fm, abych vyjasnila, pro\u010d si mysl\u00edm, \u017ee nedotahujeme v\u00fduku do konce:<\/p>\n Ned\u00e1vno jsem se na jist\u00e9ho \u010dlov\u011bka s pohrd\u00e1n\u00edm obo\u0159ila s t\u00edm, a\u0165 si to (= obal od DVD) prost\u011b p\u0159e\u010dte je\u0161t\u011b jednou a po\u0159\u00e1dn\u011b. V tu chv\u00edli m\u011b zamrazilo. Uv\u011bdomila jsem si, \u017ee doty\u010dn\u00fd v\u016fbec nev\u00ed, k \u010demu se vr\u00e1tit a co znamen\u00e1 po\u0159\u00e1dn\u011b si p\u0159e\u010d\u00edst.\u00a0 A tak si kladu ot\u00e1zku –\u00a0 Ukazujeme \u017e\u00e1k\u016fm, pro\u010d se zku\u0161en\u00fd \u010dten\u00e1\u0159 vrac\u00ed? K \u010demu to vlastn\u011b pot\u0159ebuje, i kdy\u017e je zku\u0161en\u00fd? Jak konkr\u00e9tn\u011b prohl\u00ed\u017e\u00ed text, aby na\u0161el informaci, ke kter\u00e9 se pot\u0159ebuje vr\u00e1tit? Co s n\u00ed potom ud\u011bl\u00e1? Jak nacvi\u010dujeme tyto n\u00e1vraty ve vyu\u010dov\u00e1n\u00ed? Jak m\u00e1m napl\u00e1novat v\u00fduku, abych je tohle nau\u010dila?<\/p>\n Pr\u00fd u\u010d\u00edme \u017e\u00e1ky hledat, \u010demu nerozum\u00ed. P\u0159edpokl\u00e1d\u00e1m ot\u00e1zkou, najdi mi, \u010demu konkr\u00e9tn\u011b nerozum\u00ed\u0161. Ale uk\u00e1zali jsme my sami \u017e\u00e1k\u016fm, jak hled\u00e1me, \u010demu nerozum\u00edme (nebo jsme v\u017edycky d\u011blali, \u017ee v\u00edme v\u0161echno). Jak jsme nacvi\u010dovali hled\u00e1n\u00ed neporozum\u011bn\u00ed? Shrnuli jsme spole\u010dn\u011b s \u017e\u00e1ky jednotliv\u00e9 kroky, kter\u00e9 by byli schopni samostatn\u011b zvl\u00e1dnout, kdy\u017e si pot\u0159ebuj\u00ed n\u011bco vyjasnit?<\/p>\n J\u00e1 osobn\u011b nerozum\u00edm mnoha v\u011bcem. A p\u0159izn\u00e1v\u00e1m to. Ob\u010das si p\u0159ipad\u00e1m jako ten nejhloup\u011bj\u0161\u00ed ve sv\u011bt\u011b, kde u\u017e v\u0161ichni v\u0161echno d\u011blaj\u00ed a ch\u00e1pou. I ti st\u011b\u017euj\u00edc\u00ed si, i ti st\u011b\u017eovatel\u00e9. Proto tolik obdivuje v\u0161echny Pepou\u0161e<\/a>, nestyd\u00ed se toti\u017e p\u0159iznat, \u017ee n\u011bco nev\u00ed a \u00fa\u010dastnit se diskuse. A marn\u011b vyb\u00edz\u00edm dal\u0161\u00ed (z obou st\u011b\u017eovac\u00edch skupin), aby se p\u0159idali. A – promi\u0148te mi dal\u0161\u00ed st\u011b\u017eovac\u00ed \u010dl\u00e1nek.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Posledn\u00edch n\u011bkolik m\u011bs\u00edc\u016f p\u0159ineslo spoustu kritiky sm\u011b\u0159uj\u00edc\u00ed od u\u010ditel\u016f k u\u010ditel\u016fm. Syndrom housete vysv\u011btlil, pro\u010d se n\u011bkte\u0159\u00ed necht\u011bj\u00ed vzd\u00e1t sv\u00fdch praktik. Souhlas\u00edm, nadm\u00edru souhlas\u00edm.\u00a0 Obzvl\u00e1\u0161\u0165 v oboru technologi\u00ed. Jen z toho st\u011b\u017eov\u00e1n\u00ed za\u010d\u00edn\u00e1m m\u00edt dojem, \u017ee jedni si st\u011b\u017euj\u00ed na pom\u011bry (nem\u016f\u017eu kop\u00edrovat, nemaj\u00ed slovn\u00ed z\u00e1sobu, nem\u00e1m pen\u00edze na knihy, nem\u00e1me tolik po\u010d\u00edta\u010d\u016f – tak […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":401,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-601","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-nezarazene"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogy.rvp.cz\/cteni\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/601","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogy.rvp.cz\/cteni\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogy.rvp.cz\/cteni\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogy.rvp.cz\/cteni\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/401"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogy.rvp.cz\/cteni\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=601"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/blogy.rvp.cz\/cteni\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/601\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":605,"href":"https:\/\/blogy.rvp.cz\/cteni\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/601\/revisions\/605"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogy.rvp.cz\/cteni\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=601"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogy.rvp.cz\/cteni\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=601"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogy.rvp.cz\/cteni\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=601"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}